What does the legal doctrine of "Strict Liability" apply to?

The legal doctrine of "Strict Liability" is a principle that holds an individual or entity responsible for their actions or products without the need for proof of negligence or fault. This doctrine is commonly applied in cases involving defective products that cause harm to consumers. Under strict liability, it is sufficient to demonstrate that the product was defective and that it caused injury or damage, regardless of whether the manufacturer acted with intent to cause harm or exercised reasonable care during production.

This principle is particularly important in product liability cases where consumers may not be able to prove that the manufacturer was negligent but can show that the product was unsafe or defective. The focus is on the nature of the product and its impact on consumers, thereby encouraging manufacturers to take greater care in ensuring product safety.

In contrast, the other options relate to different legal concepts. Intentional wrongdoing pertains to acts done with purpose and knowledge of their harmful consequences. Negligent acts involve a failure to exercise appropriate care, requiring evidence of fault or breach of duty. Breached contracts deal with agreements that are not fulfilled as promised, which do not fall under the strict liability framework. This understanding of strict liability clarifies its exclusive connection to product-related harm.